
One of my favourite book reviewers, Nick Hornby, wrote, “There comes a point in life, it seems to me, where you have to decide whether you’re a Person of Letters or merely someone who loves books, and I’m beginning to see that the book lovers have more fun. Persons of Letters have to read things like Candide or they’re a few letters short of the whole alphabet; book lovers, meanwhile, can read whatever they fancy.” [1]
I am a book lover. I am also a person of a fair few letters, including an M.Phil. in Women’s Studies from Trinity College Dublin and a Ph.D. in English from the University of Toronto. I have taught Canadian Literature at the University of Toronto part-time on and off for the past five years. They do not comprise the whole alphabet, but my letters are effectively gathering dust these days while my three sons are still playing with their alphabet blocks.
Such is narcissism attending the discovery of a good read, I often feel compelled to let other book lovers know what I’m reading. This project is a more formal and pointed version of that enthusiasm: discussions of books about books.
There is a link to LibraryThing (Who is responsible for that unfortunate choice of names?) where you can see my library of books about books. My zeal for collecting books about books rather outweighs the time in which I have to read them, so this project is also a way to structure my reading and, it is to be hoped, slow down my spending.
I have been hesitant about beginning a blog because I am wary of and sometimes impatient with the very proliferation of opinions that the internet has made possible. I tend not to read customer reviews on book-selling websites (you know the ones I mean) because they don’t give me what I’m after. I’m not interested in an opinion hastily dashed off. Numbered stars or thumbs up or down are too simplistic an argot for my tastes. I want depth and breadth. I want style. I want intelligence. I want a considered opinion, not a rant or a gush. No matter what the quality of the thing reviewed, what I want from the reviewer, in a word, is excellence.
I have found that excellence on many of the blogs that I visit, and I am so thrilled to be part of a book-loving community.
[1] Yes, it’s a footnote in a blog. What can I say? Old habits die hard. Nick Hornby, Housekeeping vs. The Dirt (San Francisco: Believer Books, 2006) 88.
Alas, I have lost the source for the next quotation from Robertson Davies, who said something similar, but with more affectation and much less humour: “I once wrote an essay about books and reading named ‘A Call to the Clerisy,’ and I defined that unusual and almost obsolete word like this: ‘The clerisy are those who read for pleasure, but not for idleness; who read for pastime but not to kill time; who love books, but do not live by books.’ The clerisy are not professional critics or scholars, tirelessly assessing books, or bound by their work to read a lot of books that give them no pleasure. The clerisy are those who seek, and find, delight and enlargement of life in books. The clerisy are those for whom reading is a personal art.”

Oh, Nathalie, I’m so glad you found my blog so I could find yours! I look forward to reading more about your reading….
In art historical circles there is a term, “mise en abyme,” which refers to the kind of self-referential writing you enjoy — the picture of the picture within the picture. Is this term used in literary studies?
Yes, and I’ve used the term writing about several books (Heart of Darkness, for example). Metafiction, though, is the term for literature, strictly speaking. Mise en abyme captures the idea of the multiple layers of regress and reflection so nicely though. Glad you found me too!
Natalie Foy:
You do wonderful work serving books and reading! Huzzahs!
Please take a look at Worldly Wisdom: Great Books and the Meanings of Life. It is not just another “Great Books book” but gives engagingly lucid, intellectuallly substantive, and unusually pertinent interpretations of some fifty classics of world thought and literature pointed to the understanding and conduct of life. It has already changed lives. The web site above gives details and examples.
Thanks, James.
I wished it were possible to ‘like’ this page merely for the Robertson Davies quote. Glad I stumbled on your blog!
Oh, and I found the quote here: http://www.criticalimprov.com/index.php/irss/article/viewFile/591/1022
Thanks, Pauline!
Hi Nathalie,
You said you were interested in participating in the journal project, Respond. Can you email me your postal address and I will send it on to you, if there are any blanks left after its current sojourn in Australia. meliors6(at)gmail(dot) com
Cheers
Meliors
Hi Nathalie
Nice to meet you:)
Do your children like pop-up books? Anthropologie has a new one which I would like to buy for me. . .”The Little Prince.” It’s charming and brings back the book in 3D.
HI Natalie, I saw your comment on a ‘memoir’ blog and thought I’d touch base as I so admire Rachel Cusk’s work. Did you read her latest essay in Granta’s feminism issue? A ringer.
I teach nonfiction in Victoria, BC. Tweet women and nonfiction.
http://www.christingeall.com
Best,
CG
Hi, Christin. Was that at 4mothers that you saw my comment? I am also one of the 4 mothers. I DID read the Granta essay. I had just finished her memoir of her time in Italy with her daughters and husband, The Last Supper, when I heard that the divorce piece was coming out. I could not wait to get my hands on it, which felt all wrong because, of course I was sad to hear about the divorce, but if anyone can write it, she can. A ringer indeed. She is ever so adept at articulating contradiction.
So glad to have found your blog, too.
+
Hi Nathalie,
I am a middle school reading teacher in the U.S., and I want to do a project on the ‘Journey of Books.’ It would be sort of a cool wall exhit showcasing the first forms of writing, cuneiform on clay tablets, to where we are today. Do you have any suggestions?
Thanks,
D. H.
Hi, Daisy. I love A History of Reading by Alberto Manguel. It’s got lots of illustrations and he has an engaging prose style. (There is another A History of Reading by S. R. Fischer, which I do not recommend, especially if this is for grade school students–dry.) Of course, it was published in 1996, so there’s nothing on e-readers. I am not an e-reader enthusiast myself, but for children’s books, there are so many interesting ways to make a picture book interactive in an electronic format. I’d say that that’s where the real innovations will come, in children’s e-books. Good luck with the exhibit. Make sure to add a quill and parchment for the Harry Potter fans!
I also just found this:
http://www.masteroflibraryscience.com/the-20-oldest-books-of-all-time.html
Nathalie, I just cited you as a “Versatile Blogger” in my blog — which is almost paradoxical. But books about books are pretty darn various, too!
See it here: http://carolwallace.wordpress.com/2011/10/29/versatile/
Always a pleasure to see what you’re up to!
Hi Natalie,
How are you? I’ve been following your blog for a while now and set my own book review site up a couple of months ago.
I was wondering if I could be one of your celebrated bookish blog links? My site is http://www.thebookboy.co.uk
If I could, that would be great, I’d return the favour on my blog list!!!
Hope you are well,
Happy reading
Liam, the Book Boy x
I, too, have been known to footnote my blog posts. PhDs are a disease …